File name: Pandora230s1_Gongju-KNU_20260418_L2Fit_ffus5c4d20251219p1-8.txt
File generation date: 20260623T164915.6Z
Data description: Level 2 spectral fitting results file
Data file version: ffus5c4p1-8
Local principal investigator: Hyunkee Hong
Network principal investigator: Alexander Cede
Instrument type: Pandora
Instrument number: 230
Spectrometer number: 1
Processing software version used: BlickP v1.8.88
Instrument operation file used: Pandora230_OF_v3d20220711.txt
Instrument calibration file used: Pandora230s1_CF_v4d20251219.txt
Level 1 file used: Pandora230s1_Gongju-KNU_20260418_L1_smca1c4d20251219p1-8.txt
Full location name: Kongju National University, Gongju Campus
Short location name: Gongju-KNU
Country of location: Korea, Republic of
Location latitude [deg]: 36.4710
Location longitude [deg]: 127.1450
Location altitude [m]: 64
Local noon date: 20260418
Notes on s-number (L1 configuration): Corrections NOT applied although requested by the s-number are dark map for dark correction (replaced by immediate dark method), latency correction, matrix method stray light correction (replaced by simple method)
Data caveats: None
First and last pixel inside fitting window: 291 552
Nominal wavelengths inside fitting window [nm]: 322.5001 322.6419 322.7838 322.9256 323.0674 323.2092 323.3510 323.4928 323.6346 323.7764 323.9181 324.0599 324.2016 324.3434 324.4851 324.6268 324.7685 324.9102 325.0519 325.1935 325.3352 325.4769 325.6185 325.7601 325.9018 326.0434 326.1850 326.3266 326.4681 326.6097 326.7513 326.8928 327.0344 327.1759 327.3174 327.4589 327.6004 327.7419 327.8834 328.0249 328.1663 328.3078 328.4492 328.5906 328.7321 328.8735 329.0149 329.1562 329.2976 329.4390 329.5803 329.7217 329.8630 330.0043 330.1457 330.2870 330.4282 330.5695 330.7108 330.8521 330.9933 331.1345 331.2758 331.4170 331.5582 331.6994 331.8406 331.9818 332.1229 332.2641 332.4052 332.5464 332.6875 332.8286 332.9697 333.1108 333.2519 333.3929 333.5340 333.6750 333.8161 333.9571 334.0981 334.2391 334.3801 334.5211 334.6620 334.8030 334.9440 335.0849 335.2258 335.3667 335.5076 335.6485 335.7894 335.9303 336.0711 336.2120 336.3528 336.4937 336.6345 336.7753 336.9161 337.0569 337.1976 337.3384 337.4792 337.6199 337.7606 337.9013 338.0421 338.1827 338.3234 338.4641 338.6048 338.7454 338.8861 339.0267 339.1673 339.3079 339.4485 339.5891 339.7297 339.8702 340.0108 340.1513 340.2919 340.4324 340.5729 340.7134 340.8539 340.9943 341.1348 341.2752 341.4157 341.5561 341.6965 341.8369 341.9773 342.1177 342.2581 342.3985 342.5388 342.6791 342.8195 342.9598 343.1001 343.2404 343.3807 343.5209 343.6612 343.8014 343.9417 344.0819 344.2221 344.3623 344.5025 344.6427 344.7829 344.9230 345.0632 345.2033 345.3434 345.4835 345.6236 345.7637 345.9038 346.0439 346.1839 346.3240 346.4640 346.6040 346.7440 346.8840 347.0240 347.1640 347.3039 347.4439 347.5838 347.7238 347.8637 348.0036 348.1435 348.2834 348.4232 348.5631 348.7029 348.8428 348.9826 349.1224 349.2622 349.4020 349.5418 349.6816 349.8213 349.9611 350.1008 350.2405 350.3802 350.5199 350.6596 350.7993 350.9389 351.0786 351.2182 351.3579 351.4975 351.6371 351.7767 351.9163 352.0558 352.1954 352.3349 352.4745 352.6140 352.7535 352.8930 353.0325 353.1720 353.3115 353.4509 353.5904 353.7298 353.8692 354.0086 354.1480 354.2874 354.4268 354.5661 354.7055 354.8448 354.9841 355.1235 355.2628 355.4021 355.5413 355.6806 355.8199 355.9591 356.0983 356.2376 356.3768 356.5160 356.6551 356.7943 356.9335 357.0726 357.2118 357.3509 357.4900 357.6291 357.7682 357.9073 358.0464 358.1854 358.3245 358.4635 358.6025 358.7415 358.8805 359.0195 359.1585
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Column 1: Two letter code of measurement routine
Column 2: UT date and time for center-time of measurement, yyyymmddThhmmssZ (ISO 8601)
Column 3: Fractional days since 1-Jan-2000 midnight for center-time of measurement
Column 4: Routine count (1 for the first routine of the day, 2 for the second, etc.)
Column 5: Repetition count (1 for the first set in the routine, 2 for the second, etc.)
Column 6: Total duration of measurement set in seconds
Column 7: Data processing type index
Column 8: Solar zenith angle for center-time of measurement in degree
Column 9: Solar azimuth for center-time of measurement in degree, 0=north, increases clockwise
Column 10: Lunar zenith angle for center-time of measurement in degree
Column 11: Lunar azimuth for center-time of measurement in degree, 0=north, increases clockwise
Column 12: Pointing zenith angle in degree, absolute or relative (see next column), 999=tracker not used
Column 13: Zenith pointing mode: zenith angle is... 0=absolute, 1=relative to sun, 2=relative to moon
Column 14: Pointing azimuth in degree, increases clockwise, absolute (0=north) or relative (see next column), 999=tracker not used
Column 15: Azimuth pointing mode: like zenith angle mode but also fixed scattering angles relative to sun (3) or moon (4)
Column 16: Fitting result index: 0=no error or warning, 1, 2=warning, >2=error
Column 17: Number of function evaluations used, 0=linear fitting or fitting not successful or no fitting done
Column 18: rms of unweighted fitting residuals, -9=fitting not successful
Column 19: Normalized rms of fitting residuals weighted with independent uncertainty, -9=fitting not successful or no uncertainty used
Column 20: Expected rms based on independent uncertainty, -9=fitting not successful or no uncertainty given
Column 21: Expected normalized weighted rms based on independent uncertainty, -9=fitting not successful or no uncertainty given
Column 22: Bromine oxide slant column amount [moles per square meter], -9e99=fitting not successful
Column 23: Independent uncertainty of bromine oxide slant column amount [moles per square meter], -1=cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -3=spectral fitting was done, but no independent uncertainty could be retrieved, -5=no independent uncertainty input was given, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 24: Structured uncertainty of bromine oxide slant column amount [moles per square meter], -7=not given since method "MEAS" was chosen, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 25: Common uncertainty of bromine oxide slant column amount [moles per square meter], -1=cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -6=no common uncertainty input was given, -7=not given since method "MEAS" was chosen, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 26: rms-based uncertainty of bromine oxide slant column amount [moles per square meter], -1=cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -3=spectral fitting was done, but no rms-based uncertainty could be retrieved, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 27: Bromine oxide effective temperature [K]
Column 28: Independent uncertainty of bromine oxide effective temperature [K], -1=temperature fitting was requested, but cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -2=no temperature fitting was requested and output for effective temperature and structured uncertainty of it is based on f-code, -3=spectral fitting was done, but no independent uncertainty could be retrieved, -4=temperature fitting was requested, but differential optical depth is too small to retrieve the temperature, -5=no independent uncertainty input was given, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 29: Structured uncertainty of bromine oxide effective temperature [K], -1=temperature fitting was requested, but cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -4=temperature fitting was requested, but differential optical depth is too small to retrieve the temperature, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 30: Common uncertainty of bromine oxide effective temperature [K], -1=temperature fitting was requested, but cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -2=no temperature fitting was requested and output for effective temperature and structured uncertainty of it is based on f-code, -3=spectral fitting was done, but no common uncertainty could be retrieved, -4=temperature fitting was requested, but differential optical depth is too small to retrieve the temperature, -6=no common uncertainty input was given, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 31: Effective bromine oxide fitting wavelength [nm], -9=fitting not successful
Column 32: Diffuse correction applied before fitting at effective fitting wavelength for bromine oxide [%], 0=no diffuse correction applied or fitting not requested, >0=measured diffuse correction, <0=(negative value of) calculated diffuse correction
Column 33: Formaldehyde slant column amount [moles per square meter], -9e99=fitting not successful
Column 34: Independent uncertainty of formaldehyde slant column amount [moles per square meter], -1=cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -3=spectral fitting was done, but no independent uncertainty could be retrieved, -5=no independent uncertainty input was given, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 35: Structured uncertainty of formaldehyde slant column amount [moles per square meter], -7=not given since method "MEAS" was chosen, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 36: Common uncertainty of formaldehyde slant column amount [moles per square meter], -1=cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -6=no common uncertainty input was given, -7=not given since method "MEAS" was chosen, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 37: rms-based uncertainty of formaldehyde slant column amount [moles per square meter], -1=cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -3=spectral fitting was done, but no rms-based uncertainty could be retrieved, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 38: Formaldehyde effective temperature [K]
Column 39: Independent uncertainty of formaldehyde effective temperature [K], -1=temperature fitting was requested, but cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -2=no temperature fitting was requested and output for effective temperature and structured uncertainty of it is based on f-code, -3=spectral fitting was done, but no independent uncertainty could be retrieved, -4=temperature fitting was requested, but differential optical depth is too small to retrieve the temperature, -5=no independent uncertainty input was given, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 40: Structured uncertainty of formaldehyde effective temperature [K], -1=temperature fitting was requested, but cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -4=temperature fitting was requested, but differential optical depth is too small to retrieve the temperature, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 41: Common uncertainty of formaldehyde effective temperature [K], -1=temperature fitting was requested, but cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -2=no temperature fitting was requested and output for effective temperature and structured uncertainty of it is based on f-code, -3=spectral fitting was done, but no common uncertainty could be retrieved, -4=temperature fitting was requested, but differential optical depth is too small to retrieve the temperature, -6=no common uncertainty input was given, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 42: Effective formaldehyde fitting wavelength [nm], -9=fitting not successful
Column 43: Diffuse correction applied before fitting at effective fitting wavelength for formaldehyde [%], 0=no diffuse correction applied or fitting not requested, >0=measured diffuse correction, <0=(negative value of) calculated diffuse correction
Column 44: Nitrous acid slant column amount [moles per square meter], -9e99=fitting not successful
Column 45: Independent uncertainty of nitrous acid slant column amount [moles per square meter], -1=cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -3=spectral fitting was done, but no independent uncertainty could be retrieved, -5=no independent uncertainty input was given, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 46: Structured uncertainty of nitrous acid slant column amount [moles per square meter], -7=not given since method "MEAS" was chosen, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 47: Common uncertainty of nitrous acid slant column amount [moles per square meter], -1=cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -6=no common uncertainty input was given, -7=not given since method "MEAS" was chosen, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 48: rms-based uncertainty of nitrous acid slant column amount [moles per square meter], -1=cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -3=spectral fitting was done, but no rms-based uncertainty could be retrieved, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 49: Nitrous acid effective temperature [K]
Column 50: Independent uncertainty of nitrous acid effective temperature [K], -1=temperature fitting was requested, but cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -2=no temperature fitting was requested and output for effective temperature and structured uncertainty of it is based on f-code, -3=spectral fitting was done, but no independent uncertainty could be retrieved, -4=temperature fitting was requested, but differential optical depth is too small to retrieve the temperature, -5=no independent uncertainty input was given, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 51: Structured uncertainty of nitrous acid effective temperature [K], -1=temperature fitting was requested, but cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -4=temperature fitting was requested, but differential optical depth is too small to retrieve the temperature, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 52: Common uncertainty of nitrous acid effective temperature [K], -1=temperature fitting was requested, but cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -2=no temperature fitting was requested and output for effective temperature and structured uncertainty of it is based on f-code, -3=spectral fitting was done, but no common uncertainty could be retrieved, -4=temperature fitting was requested, but differential optical depth is too small to retrieve the temperature, -6=no common uncertainty input was given, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 53: Effective nitrous acid fitting wavelength [nm], -9=fitting not successful
Column 54: Diffuse correction applied before fitting at effective fitting wavelength for nitrous acid [%], 0=no diffuse correction applied or fitting not requested, >0=measured diffuse correction, <0=(negative value of) calculated diffuse correction
Column 55: Nitrogen dioxide slant column amount [moles per square meter], -9e99=fitting not successful
Column 56: Independent uncertainty of nitrogen dioxide slant column amount [moles per square meter], -1=cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -3=spectral fitting was done, but no independent uncertainty could be retrieved, -5=no independent uncertainty input was given, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 57: Structured uncertainty of nitrogen dioxide slant column amount [moles per square meter], -7=not given since method "MEAS" was chosen, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 58: Common uncertainty of nitrogen dioxide slant column amount [moles per square meter], -1=cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -6=no common uncertainty input was given, -7=not given since method "MEAS" was chosen, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 59: rms-based uncertainty of nitrogen dioxide slant column amount [moles per square meter], -1=cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -3=spectral fitting was done, but no rms-based uncertainty could be retrieved, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 60: Nitrogen dioxide effective temperature [K]
Column 61: Independent uncertainty of nitrogen dioxide effective temperature [K], -1=temperature fitting was requested, but cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -2=no temperature fitting was requested and output for effective temperature and structured uncertainty of it is based on f-code, -3=spectral fitting was done, but no independent uncertainty could be retrieved, -4=temperature fitting was requested, but differential optical depth is too small to retrieve the temperature, -5=no independent uncertainty input was given, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 62: Structured uncertainty of nitrogen dioxide effective temperature [K], -1=temperature fitting was requested, but cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -4=temperature fitting was requested, but differential optical depth is too small to retrieve the temperature, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 63: Common uncertainty of nitrogen dioxide effective temperature [K], -1=temperature fitting was requested, but cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -2=no temperature fitting was requested and output for effective temperature and structured uncertainty of it is based on f-code, -3=spectral fitting was done, but no common uncertainty could be retrieved, -4=temperature fitting was requested, but differential optical depth is too small to retrieve the temperature, -6=no common uncertainty input was given, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 64: Effective nitrogen dioxide fitting wavelength [nm], -9=fitting not successful
Column 65: Diffuse correction applied before fitting at effective fitting wavelength for nitrogen dioxide [%], 0=no diffuse correction applied or fitting not requested, >0=measured diffuse correction, <0=(negative value of) calculated diffuse correction
Column 66: Oxygen dimer slant column amount [moles squared per meter to the 5th], -9e99=fitting not successful
Column 67: Independent uncertainty of oxygen dimer slant column amount [moles squared per meter to the 5th], -1=cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -3=spectral fitting was done, but no independent uncertainty could be retrieved, -5=no independent uncertainty input was given, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 68: Structured uncertainty of oxygen dimer slant column amount [moles squared per meter to the 5th], -7=not given since method "MEAS" was chosen, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 69: Common uncertainty of oxygen dimer slant column amount [moles squared per meter to the 5th], -1=cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -6=no common uncertainty input was given, -7=not given since method "MEAS" was chosen, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 70: rms-based uncertainty of oxygen dimer slant column amount [moles squared per meter to the 5th], -1=cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -3=spectral fitting was done, but no rms-based uncertainty could be retrieved, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 71: Oxygen dimer effective temperature [K]
Column 72: Independent uncertainty of oxygen dimer effective temperature [K], -1=temperature fitting was requested, but cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -2=no temperature fitting was requested and output for effective temperature and structured uncertainty of it is based on f-code, -3=spectral fitting was done, but no independent uncertainty could be retrieved, -4=temperature fitting was requested, but differential optical depth is too small to retrieve the temperature, -5=no independent uncertainty input was given, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 73: Structured uncertainty of oxygen dimer effective temperature [K], -1=temperature fitting was requested, but cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -4=temperature fitting was requested, but differential optical depth is too small to retrieve the temperature, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 74: Common uncertainty of oxygen dimer effective temperature [K], -1=temperature fitting was requested, but cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -2=no temperature fitting was requested and output for effective temperature and structured uncertainty of it is based on f-code, -3=spectral fitting was done, but no common uncertainty could be retrieved, -4=temperature fitting was requested, but differential optical depth is too small to retrieve the temperature, -6=no common uncertainty input was given, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 75: Effective oxygen dimer fitting wavelength [nm], -9=fitting not successful
Column 76: Diffuse correction applied before fitting at effective fitting wavelength for oxygen dimer [%], 0=no diffuse correction applied or fitting not requested, >0=measured diffuse correction, <0=(negative value of) calculated diffuse correction
Column 77: Ozone slant column amount [moles per square meter], -9e99=fitting not successful
Column 78: Independent uncertainty of ozone slant column amount [moles per square meter], -1=cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -3=spectral fitting was done, but no independent uncertainty could be retrieved, -5=no independent uncertainty input was given, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 79: Structured uncertainty of ozone slant column amount [moles per square meter], -7=not given since method "MEAS" was chosen, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 80: Common uncertainty of ozone slant column amount [moles per square meter], -1=cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -6=no common uncertainty input was given, -7=not given since method "MEAS" was chosen, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 81: rms-based uncertainty of ozone slant column amount [moles per square meter], -1=cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -3=spectral fitting was done, but no rms-based uncertainty could be retrieved, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 82: Ozone effective temperature [K]
Column 83: Independent uncertainty of ozone effective temperature [K], -1=temperature fitting was requested, but cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -2=no temperature fitting was requested and output for effective temperature and structured uncertainty of it is based on f-code, -3=spectral fitting was done, but no independent uncertainty could be retrieved, -4=temperature fitting was requested, but differential optical depth is too small to retrieve the temperature, -5=no independent uncertainty input was given, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 84: Structured uncertainty of ozone effective temperature [K], -1=temperature fitting was requested, but cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -4=temperature fitting was requested, but differential optical depth is too small to retrieve the temperature, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 85: Common uncertainty of ozone effective temperature [K], -1=temperature fitting was requested, but cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -2=no temperature fitting was requested and output for effective temperature and structured uncertainty of it is based on f-code, -3=spectral fitting was done, but no common uncertainty could be retrieved, -4=temperature fitting was requested, but differential optical depth is too small to retrieve the temperature, -6=no common uncertainty input was given, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 86: Effective ozone fitting wavelength [nm], -9=fitting not successful
Column 87: Diffuse correction applied before fitting at effective fitting wavelength for ozone [%], 0=no diffuse correction applied or fitting not requested, >0=measured diffuse correction, <0=(negative value of) calculated diffuse correction
Column 88: Sulfur dioxide slant column amount [moles per square meter], -9e99=fitting not successful
Column 89: Independent uncertainty of sulfur dioxide slant column amount [moles per square meter], -1=cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -3=spectral fitting was done, but no independent uncertainty could be retrieved, -5=no independent uncertainty input was given, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 90: Structured uncertainty of sulfur dioxide slant column amount [moles per square meter], -7=not given since method "MEAS" was chosen, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 91: Common uncertainty of sulfur dioxide slant column amount [moles per square meter], -1=cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -6=no common uncertainty input was given, -7=not given since method "MEAS" was chosen, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 92: rms-based uncertainty of sulfur dioxide slant column amount [moles per square meter], -1=cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -3=spectral fitting was done, but no rms-based uncertainty could be retrieved, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 93: Sulfur dioxide effective temperature [K]
Column 94: Independent uncertainty of sulfur dioxide effective temperature [K], -1=temperature fitting was requested, but cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -2=no temperature fitting was requested and output for effective temperature and structured uncertainty of it is based on f-code, -3=spectral fitting was done, but no independent uncertainty could be retrieved, -4=temperature fitting was requested, but differential optical depth is too small to retrieve the temperature, -5=no independent uncertainty input was given, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 95: Structured uncertainty of sulfur dioxide effective temperature [K], -1=temperature fitting was requested, but cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -4=temperature fitting was requested, but differential optical depth is too small to retrieve the temperature, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 96: Common uncertainty of sulfur dioxide effective temperature [K], -1=temperature fitting was requested, but cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -2=no temperature fitting was requested and output for effective temperature and structured uncertainty of it is based on f-code, -3=spectral fitting was done, but no common uncertainty could be retrieved, -4=temperature fitting was requested, but differential optical depth is too small to retrieve the temperature, -6=no common uncertainty input was given, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 97: Effective sulfur dioxide fitting wavelength [nm], -9=fitting not successful
Column 98: Diffuse correction applied before fitting at effective fitting wavelength for sulfur dioxide [%], 0=no diffuse correction applied or fitting not requested, >0=measured diffuse correction, <0=(negative value of) calculated diffuse correction
Column 99: Molecular scattering air mass factor used for molecular scattering subtraction before the fitting
Column 100: Estimated uncertainty of molecular scattering air mass factor, -9=molecular scattering was not subtracted before the fitting
Column 101: Lower limit used for wavelength scaling [nm]
Column 102: Upper limit used for wavelength scaling [nm]
Column 103: Order of smoothing polynomial
Column 104: Smoothing polynomial coefficient, order 0
Column 105: Independent uncertainty of smoothing polynomial coefficient, order 0, -9=fitting not successful
Column 106: Structured uncertainty of smoothing polynomial coefficient, order 0, -9=fitting not successful
Column 107: Common uncertainty of smoothing polynomial coefficient, order 0, -9=fitting not successful
Column 108: rms-based uncertainty of smoothing polynomial coefficient, order 0, -9=fitting not successful
Column 109: Smoothing polynomial coefficient, order 1
Column 110: Independent uncertainty of smoothing polynomial coefficient, order 1, -9=fitting not successful
Column 111: Structured uncertainty of smoothing polynomial coefficient, order 1, -9=fitting not successful
Column 112: Common uncertainty of smoothing polynomial coefficient, order 1, -9=fitting not successful
Column 113: rms-based uncertainty of smoothing polynomial coefficient, order 1, -9=fitting not successful
Column 114: Smoothing polynomial coefficient, order 2
Column 115: Independent uncertainty of smoothing polynomial coefficient, order 2, -9=fitting not successful
Column 116: Structured uncertainty of smoothing polynomial coefficient, order 2, -9=fitting not successful
Column 117: Common uncertainty of smoothing polynomial coefficient, order 2, -9=fitting not successful
Column 118: rms-based uncertainty of smoothing polynomial coefficient, order 2, -9=fitting not successful
Column 119: Smoothing polynomial coefficient, order 3
Column 120: Independent uncertainty of smoothing polynomial coefficient, order 3, -9=fitting not successful
Column 121: Structured uncertainty of smoothing polynomial coefficient, order 3, -9=fitting not successful
Column 122: Common uncertainty of smoothing polynomial coefficient, order 3, -9=fitting not successful
Column 123: rms-based uncertainty of smoothing polynomial coefficient, order 3, -9=fitting not successful
Column 124: Smoothing polynomial coefficient, order 4
Column 125: Independent uncertainty of smoothing polynomial coefficient, order 4, -9=fitting not successful
Column 126: Structured uncertainty of smoothing polynomial coefficient, order 4, -9=fitting not successful
Column 127: Common uncertainty of smoothing polynomial coefficient, order 4, -9=fitting not successful
Column 128: rms-based uncertainty of smoothing polynomial coefficient, order 4, -9=fitting not successful
Column 129: Mean value of measured data inside fitting window [same units as measurements]
Column 130: Offset polynomial coefficient, order 0
Column 131: Independent uncertainty of offset polynomial coefficient, order 0, -9=fitting not successful
Column 132: Structured uncertainty of offset polynomial coefficient, order 0, -9=fitting not successful
Column 133: Common uncertainty of offset polynomial coefficient, order 0, -9=fitting not successful
Column 134: rms-based uncertainty of offset polynomial coefficient, order 0, -9=fitting not successful
Column 135: Wavelength change polynomial coefficient, order 0
Column 136: Independent uncertainty of wavelength change polynomial coefficient, order 0, -9=fitting not successful
Column 137: Structured uncertainty of wavelength change polynomial coefficient, order 0, -9=fitting not successful
Column 138: Common uncertainty of wavelength change polynomial coefficient, order 0, -9=fitting not successful
Column 139: rms-based uncertainty of wavelength change polynomial coefficient, order 0, -9=fitting not successful
Column 140: L1 based wavelength change coefficient, order 0, -9=no L1 wavelength change determination
Column 141: L1 based wavelength change coefficient, order 1, -9=no L1 wavelength change determination
Column 142: Resolution change polynomial coefficient, order 0
Column 143: Independent uncertainty of resolution change polynomial coefficient, order 0, -9=fitting not successful
Column 144: Structured uncertainty of resolution change polynomial coefficient, order 0, -9=fitting not successful
Column 145: Common uncertainty of resolution change polynomial coefficient, order 0, -9=fitting not successful
Column 146: rms-based uncertainty of resolution change polynomial coefficient, order 0, -9=fitting not successful
Column 147: L2Fit data quality flag: 0=assured high quality, 1=assured medium quality, 2=assured low quality, 10=not-assured high quality, 11=not-assured medium quality, 12=not-assured low quality
Column 148: Sum over 2^i using those i, for which the corresponding L2Fit data quality parameter exceeds the DQ1 limit, 0=L1 data quality above 0, 1=Spectral fitting was not successful, 2=Wavelength shift too large, 3=Normalized rms of fitting residuals weighted with independent uncertainty too large
Column 149: Sum over 2^i using those i, for which the corresponding L2Fit data quality parameter exceeds the DQ2 limit (same parameters as for DQ1)
Column 150: L1 data quality flag: 0=assured high quality, 1=assured medium quality, 2=assured low quality, 10=not-assured high quality, 11=not-assured medium quality, 12=not-assured low quality
Column 151: Sum over 2^i using those i, for which the corresponding L1 data quality parameter exceeds the DQ1 limit, 0=Saturated data, 1=Too few dark counts measurements, 2=No temperature given or effective temperature too different from the reference temperature, 3=Dark count too high, 4=Unsuccessful dark background fitting, 5=The dark count differs significantly from the dark map for too many pixels, 6=Absolute value of estimated average residual stray light level too high, 7=Although attempted, no wavelength change could be retrieved, 8=Absolute value of retrieved wavelength shift too large, 9=Retrieved wavelength shift differs too much from the shift predicted by the effective temperature
Column 152: Sum over 2^i using those i, for which the corresponding L1 data quality parameter exceeds the DQ2 limit (same parameters as for DQ1)
Column 153: Atmospheric variability [%], 999=no atmospheric variability was determined
Column 154: Wavelength effective temperature [°C], 999=no effective temperature given
Column 155: Estimated average residual stray light level [%] (only valid for stray light correction methods 2 and higher)
Column 156: Retrieved wavelength shift from L1 data [nm], -9=no wavelength change determination
Column 157: Retrieved total wavelength shift [nm], -9=no wavelength change fitting
Column 158: Number of bright count cycles
Column 159: Number of dark count cycles
Column 160: Effective position of filterwheel #1, 0=filterwheel not used, 1-9 are valid positions
Column 161: Effective position of filterwheel #2, 0=filterwheel not used, 1-9 are valid positions
Column 162: Sum over 2^i, 0=spectra were interpolated in time, 1=spectra are corrected for off-target signal
Column 163: Integration time [ms]
Column 164: Spectrometer control temperature [°C], 999=no temperature signal
Column 165: Auxiliary spectrometer temperature [°C], 999=no temperature signal
Column 166: Temperature in head sensor [°C], 999=no temperature signal
Column 167: Temperature at electronics board 1 [°C], 999=no temperature signal
Column 168: Temperature at electronics board 2 [°C], 999=no temperature signal
Column 169: Humidity in head sensor [%], -9=no humidity signal
Column 170: Pressure in head sensor [hPa], -9=no pressure signal
Columns 171-432: Unweighted slant column residuals for each pixel inside the fitting window multiplied by 1e5, 9e5=pixel was not used for fitting
Columns 433-694: Normalized slant column residuals weighted with independent instrumental uncertainty for each pixel inside the fitting window multiplied by 1e5, 9e5=pixel was not used for fitting, 0=no independent instrumental uncertainty was given
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------