File name: Pandora242s1_Trollhaugen_20260204_L2Fit_fout2c5d20241105p1-8.txt
File generation date: 20260205T002341.2Z
Data description: Level 2 spectral fitting results file
Data file version: fout2c5p1-8
Local principal investigator: Ann Mari Fjaeraa
Network principal investigator: Alexander Cede
Instrument type: Pandora
Instrument number: 242
Spectrometer number: 1
Processing software version used: BlickP v1.8.75
Instrument operation file used: Pandora242_OF_v4d20220919.txt
Instrument calibration file used: Pandora242s1_CF_v5d20241105.txt
Level 1 file used: Pandora242s1_Trollhaugen_20260204_L1_smca1c5d20241105p1-8.txt
Full location name: Trollhaugen Observatory
Short location name: Trollhaugen
Country of location: Antarctica
Location latitude [deg]: -72.0112
Location longitude [deg]: 2.5350
Location altitude [m]: 1553
Local noon date: 20260204
Notes on s-number (L1 configuration): Corrections NOT applied although requested by the s-number are blind pixel subtraction, dark map for dark correction (replaced by immediate dark method), latency correction, radiometric temperature correction, matrix method stray light correction (replaced by simple method)
Data caveats: based on session 3 for new fieldcal from end of 2024
First and last pixel inside fitting window: 204 346
Nominal wavelengths inside fitting window [nm]: 305.1337 305.2745 305.4152 305.5559 305.6966 305.8373 305.9780 306.1187 306.2593 306.4000 306.5406 306.6812 306.8218 306.9624 307.1030 307.2436 307.3841 307.5247 307.6652 307.8057 307.9462 308.0867 308.2272 308.3677 308.5081 308.6486 308.7890 308.9295 309.0699 309.2103 309.3506 309.4910 309.6314 309.7717 309.9121 310.0524 310.1927 310.3330 310.4733 310.6136 310.7538 310.8941 311.0343 311.1745 311.3147 311.4550 311.5951 311.7353 311.8755 312.0156 312.1558 312.2959 312.4360 312.5761 312.7162 312.8563 312.9964 313.1364 313.2765 313.4165 313.5565 313.6965 313.8365 313.9765 314.1165 314.2564 314.3964 314.5363 314.6762 314.8161 314.9560 315.0959 315.2358 315.3756 315.5155 315.6553 315.7951 315.9349 316.0747 316.2145 316.3543 316.4941 316.6338 316.7735 316.9133 317.0530 317.1927 317.3324 317.4720 317.6117 317.7514 317.8910 318.0306 318.1702 318.3098 318.4494 318.5890 318.7286 318.8681 319.0077 319.1472 319.2867 319.4262 319.5657 319.7052 319.8447 319.9841 320.1236 320.2630 320.4024 320.5418 320.6812 320.8206 320.9600 321.0994 321.2387 321.3780 321.5174 321.6567 321.7960 321.9353 322.0745 322.2138 322.3530 322.4923 322.6315 322.7707 322.9099 323.0491 323.1883 323.3275 323.4666 323.6058 323.7449 323.8840 324.0231 324.1622 324.3013 324.4403 324.5794 324.7184 324.8575 324.9965
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Column 1: Two letter code of measurement routine
Column 2: UT date and time for center-time of measurement, yyyymmddThhmmssZ (ISO 8601)
Column 3: Fractional days since 1-Jan-2000 midnight for center-time of measurement
Column 4: Routine count (1 for the first routine of the day, 2 for the second, etc.)
Column 5: Repetition count (1 for the first set in the routine, 2 for the second, etc.)
Column 6: Total duration of measurement set in seconds
Column 7: Data processing type index
Column 8: Solar zenith angle for center-time of measurement in degree
Column 9: Solar azimuth for center-time of measurement in degree, 0=north, increases clockwise
Column 10: Lunar zenith angle for center-time of measurement in degree
Column 11: Lunar azimuth for center-time of measurement in degree, 0=north, increases clockwise
Column 12: Pointing zenith angle in degree, absolute or relative (see next column), 999=tracker not used
Column 13: Zenith pointing mode: zenith angle is... 0=absolute, 1=relative to sun, 2=relative to moon
Column 14: Pointing azimuth in degree, increases clockwise, absolute (0=north) or relative (see next column), 999=tracker not used
Column 15: Azimuth pointing mode: like zenith angle mode but also fixed scattering angles relative to sun (3) or moon (4)
Column 16: Fitting result index: 0=no error or warning, 1, 2=warning, >2=error
Column 17: Number of function evaluations used, 0=linear fitting or fitting not successful or no fitting done
Column 18: rms of unweighted fitting residuals, -9=fitting not successful
Column 19: Normalized rms of fitting residuals weighted with independent uncertainty, -9=fitting not successful or no uncertainty used
Column 20: Expected rms based on independent uncertainty, -9=fitting not successful or no uncertainty given
Column 21: Expected normalized weighted rms based on independent uncertainty, -9=fitting not successful or no uncertainty given
Column 22: Ozone slant column amount [moles per square meter], -9e99=fitting not successful
Column 23: Independent uncertainty of ozone slant column amount [moles per square meter], -1=cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -3=spectral fitting was done, but no independent uncertainty could be retrieved, -5=no independent uncertainty input was given, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 24: Structured uncertainty of ozone slant column amount [moles per square meter], -7=not given since method "MEAS" was chosen, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 25: Common uncertainty of ozone slant column amount [moles per square meter], -1=cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -6=no common uncertainty input was given, -7=not given since method "MEAS" was chosen, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 26: rms-based uncertainty of ozone slant column amount [moles per square meter], -1=cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -3=spectral fitting was done, but no rms-based uncertainty could be retrieved, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 27: Ozone effective temperature [K]
Column 28: Independent uncertainty of ozone effective temperature [K], -1=temperature fitting was requested, but cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -2=no temperature fitting was requested and output for effective temperature and structured uncertainty of it is based on f-code, -3=spectral fitting was done, but no independent uncertainty could be retrieved, -4=temperature fitting was requested, but differential optical depth is too small to retrieve the temperature, -5=no independent uncertainty input was given, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 29: Structured uncertainty of ozone effective temperature [K], -1=temperature fitting was requested, but cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -4=temperature fitting was requested, but differential optical depth is too small to retrieve the temperature, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 30: Common uncertainty of ozone effective temperature [K], -1=temperature fitting was requested, but cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -2=no temperature fitting was requested and output for effective temperature and structured uncertainty of it is based on f-code, -3=spectral fitting was done, but no common uncertainty could be retrieved, -4=temperature fitting was requested, but differential optical depth is too small to retrieve the temperature, -6=no common uncertainty input was given, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 31: Effective ozone fitting wavelength [nm], -9=fitting not successful
Column 32: Diffuse correction applied before fitting at effective fitting wavelength for ozone [%], 0=no diffuse correction applied or fitting not requested, >0=measured diffuse correction, <0=(negative value of) calculated diffuse correction
Column 33: Sulfur dioxide slant column amount [moles per square meter], -9e99=fitting not successful
Column 34: Independent uncertainty of sulfur dioxide slant column amount [moles per square meter], -1=cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -3=spectral fitting was done, but no independent uncertainty could be retrieved, -5=no independent uncertainty input was given, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 35: Structured uncertainty of sulfur dioxide slant column amount [moles per square meter], -7=not given since method "MEAS" was chosen, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 36: Common uncertainty of sulfur dioxide slant column amount [moles per square meter], -1=cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -6=no common uncertainty input was given, -7=not given since method "MEAS" was chosen, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 37: rms-based uncertainty of sulfur dioxide slant column amount [moles per square meter], -1=cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -3=spectral fitting was done, but no rms-based uncertainty could be retrieved, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 38: Sulfur dioxide effective temperature [K]
Column 39: Independent uncertainty of sulfur dioxide effective temperature [K], -1=temperature fitting was requested, but cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -2=no temperature fitting was requested and output for effective temperature and structured uncertainty of it is based on f-code, -3=spectral fitting was done, but no independent uncertainty could be retrieved, -4=temperature fitting was requested, but differential optical depth is too small to retrieve the temperature, -5=no independent uncertainty input was given, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 40: Structured uncertainty of sulfur dioxide effective temperature [K], -1=temperature fitting was requested, but cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -4=temperature fitting was requested, but differential optical depth is too small to retrieve the temperature, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 41: Common uncertainty of sulfur dioxide effective temperature [K], -1=temperature fitting was requested, but cross section is zero in this wavelength range, -2=no temperature fitting was requested and output for effective temperature and structured uncertainty of it is based on f-code, -3=spectral fitting was done, but no common uncertainty could be retrieved, -4=temperature fitting was requested, but differential optical depth is too small to retrieve the temperature, -6=no common uncertainty input was given, -9=spectral fitting not successful
Column 42: Effective sulfur dioxide fitting wavelength [nm], -9=fitting not successful
Column 43: Diffuse correction applied before fitting at effective fitting wavelength for sulfur dioxide [%], 0=no diffuse correction applied or fitting not requested, >0=measured diffuse correction, <0=(negative value of) calculated diffuse correction
Column 44: Molecular scattering air mass factor used for molecular scattering subtraction before the fitting
Column 45: Estimated uncertainty of molecular scattering air mass factor, -9=molecular scattering was not subtracted before the fitting
Column 46: Lower limit used for wavelength scaling [nm]
Column 47: Upper limit used for wavelength scaling [nm]
Column 48: Order of smoothing polynomial
Column 49: Smoothing polynomial coefficient, order 0
Column 50: Independent uncertainty of smoothing polynomial coefficient, order 0, -9=fitting not successful
Column 51: Structured uncertainty of smoothing polynomial coefficient, order 0, -9=fitting not successful
Column 52: Common uncertainty of smoothing polynomial coefficient, order 0, -9=fitting not successful
Column 53: rms-based uncertainty of smoothing polynomial coefficient, order 0, -9=fitting not successful
Column 54: Smoothing polynomial coefficient, order 1
Column 55: Independent uncertainty of smoothing polynomial coefficient, order 1, -9=fitting not successful
Column 56: Structured uncertainty of smoothing polynomial coefficient, order 1, -9=fitting not successful
Column 57: Common uncertainty of smoothing polynomial coefficient, order 1, -9=fitting not successful
Column 58: rms-based uncertainty of smoothing polynomial coefficient, order 1, -9=fitting not successful
Column 59: Smoothing polynomial coefficient, order 2
Column 60: Independent uncertainty of smoothing polynomial coefficient, order 2, -9=fitting not successful
Column 61: Structured uncertainty of smoothing polynomial coefficient, order 2, -9=fitting not successful
Column 62: Common uncertainty of smoothing polynomial coefficient, order 2, -9=fitting not successful
Column 63: rms-based uncertainty of smoothing polynomial coefficient, order 2, -9=fitting not successful
Column 64: Smoothing polynomial coefficient, order 3
Column 65: Independent uncertainty of smoothing polynomial coefficient, order 3, -9=fitting not successful
Column 66: Structured uncertainty of smoothing polynomial coefficient, order 3, -9=fitting not successful
Column 67: Common uncertainty of smoothing polynomial coefficient, order 3, -9=fitting not successful
Column 68: rms-based uncertainty of smoothing polynomial coefficient, order 3, -9=fitting not successful
Column 69: Mean value of measured data inside fitting window [same units as measurements]
Column 70: Wavelength change polynomial coefficient, order 0
Column 71: Independent uncertainty of wavelength change polynomial coefficient, order 0, -9=fitting not successful
Column 72: Structured uncertainty of wavelength change polynomial coefficient, order 0, -9=fitting not successful
Column 73: Common uncertainty of wavelength change polynomial coefficient, order 0, -9=fitting not successful
Column 74: rms-based uncertainty of wavelength change polynomial coefficient, order 0, -9=fitting not successful
Column 75: L1 based wavelength change coefficient, order 0, -9=no L1 wavelength change determination
Column 76: L1 based wavelength change coefficient, order 1, -9=no L1 wavelength change determination
Column 77: L2Fit data quality flag: 0=assured high quality, 1=assured medium quality, 2=assured low quality, 10=not-assured high quality, 11=not-assured medium quality, 12=not-assured low quality
Column 78: Sum over 2^i using those i, for which the corresponding L2Fit data quality parameter exceeds the DQ1 limit, 0=L1 data quality above 0, 1=Spectral fitting was not successful, 2=Wavelength shift too large, 3=Normalized rms of fitting residuals weighted with independent uncertainty too large
Column 79: Sum over 2^i using those i, for which the corresponding L2Fit data quality parameter exceeds the DQ2 limit (same parameters as for DQ1)
Column 80: L1 data quality flag: 0=assured high quality, 1=assured medium quality, 2=assured low quality, 10=not-assured high quality, 11=not-assured medium quality, 12=not-assured low quality
Column 81: Sum over 2^i using those i, for which the corresponding L1 data quality parameter exceeds the DQ1 limit, 0=Saturated data, 1=Too few dark counts measurements, 2=No temperature given or effective temperature too different from the reference temperature, 3=Dark count too high, 4=Unsuccessful dark background fitting, 5=The dark count differs significantly from the dark map for too many pixels, 6=Absolute value of estimated average residual stray light level too high, 7=Although attempted, no wavelength change could be retrieved, 8=Absolute value of retrieved wavelength shift too large, 9=Retrieved wavelength shift differs too much from the shift predicted by the effective temperature
Column 82: Sum over 2^i using those i, for which the corresponding L1 data quality parameter exceeds the DQ2 limit (same parameters as for DQ1)
Column 83: Atmospheric variability [%], 999=no atmospheric variability was determined
Column 84: Wavelength effective temperature [°C], 999=no effective temperature given
Column 85: Estimated average residual stray light level [%] (only valid for stray light correction methods 2 and higher)
Column 86: Retrieved wavelength shift from L1 data [nm], -9=no wavelength change determination
Column 87: Retrieved total wavelength shift [nm], -9=no wavelength change fitting
Column 88: Number of bright count cycles
Column 89: Number of dark count cycles
Column 90: Effective position of filterwheel #1, 0=filterwheel not used, 1-9 are valid positions
Column 91: Effective position of filterwheel #2, 0=filterwheel not used, 1-9 are valid positions
Column 92: Sum over 2^i, 0=spectra were interpolated in time, 1=spectra are corrected for off-target signal
Column 93: Integration time [ms]
Column 94: Spectrometer control temperature [°C], 999=no temperature signal
Column 95: Auxiliary spectrometer temperature [°C], 999=no temperature signal
Column 96: Temperature in head sensor [°C], 999=no temperature signal
Column 97: Azimuth motor temperature [°C], 999=no temperature signal
Column 98: Azimuth driver temperature [°C], 999=no temperature signal
Column 99: Zenith motor temperature [°C], 999=no temperature signal
Column 100: Zenith driver temperature [°C], 999=no temperature signal
Column 101: Temperature at electronics board 1 [°C], 999=no temperature signal
Column 102: Temperature at electronics board 2 [°C], 999=no temperature signal
Column 103: Humidity in head sensor [%], -9=no humidity signal
Column 104: Pressure in head sensor [hPa], -9=no pressure signal
Columns 105-247: Unweighted slant column residuals for each pixel inside the fitting window multiplied by 1e5, 9e5=pixel was not used for fitting
Columns 248-390: Normalized slant column residuals weighted with independent instrumental uncertainty for each pixel inside the fitting window multiplied by 1e5, 9e5=pixel was not used for fitting, 0=no independent instrumental uncertainty was given
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------